Miklós Lukács de Pereny (Lima, 1975) is a British-Hungarian-Peruvian scholar working at the intersections of Politics, Philosophy, and Science, Technology & Innovation Studies (STI). He holds a PhD in Management and a MSc in Innovation Management from the University of Manchester, UK, a Master of Development Studies from Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, and a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) degree from Universidad Mayor de Chile. He is the author of the best-seller, ‘Neo Entities: Technology and Anthropological Change in the 21st Century’ with over 15,000 copies sold in more than 30 countries. He resides between Peru and the United Kingdom.

The rainbow flag flames in government houses, universities, hotels, hospitals, cinemas, restaurants, and countless other public and private facilities of every city in the West. However, it is not the flag of the LGBTPZ+ community but the flag of globalist progressivism. It is the hijacking of a cherished Christian symbol at the service of exclusionary and dehumanizing causes. Globalism, the gradual, unilateral, and unconsented imposition of a single political, economic, technological, social and cultural system is characterized by verticalization and concentration of power aimed at abolishing the concept of identity, from the individual to the national.

Symbols must be accompanied by a discourse built on basic principles stating its motivations, intentions and guiding postulates. The basic principles of the progressive discourse are 'diversity’, 'equality’ and 'inclusion’ which have been copy-pasted from the tripartite slogan 'Liberté, egalité, fraternité’ inherited from the utilitarian, materialistic, secular and revolutionary matrix of the XVIII century. The progressive meaning of 'diversity’ is an antonym of its original meaning and has been reduced to the aesthetic and the sexual. However, the most relevant diversity of all, diversity of thought, is being completely crushed in the name of 'equality’.

The practice of progressive 'equality’ is also antagonistic. What it really seeks is to standardize human beings in two essential aspects: (i) at the level of thought in order to domesticate and control the masses, a task that is already being implemented through a series of disincentives such as stigmatization, censorship, and even prison for those who question 'official truths’, and; (ii) at the level of sexual and reproductive behaviour. Regarding the second aspect, the apparent existential risk posed by climate change is of such magnitude that any intervention preventing its realization will be morally justified. This justification is greatly facilitated if, as the British zoologist David Attenborough points out, we become a 'human plague’. Plagues must be controlled (or exterminated), and if we are the cause of the existential risk, the logical conclusion is to control our numbers: fewer human beings means less plague, less capitalism, less consumption, less pollution, lower temperatures, and less existential risk. This is the synthesis of Malthusian logic, the first justification for demographic control.

Demographic control is not a 'conspiracy theory’ but a verifiable event supported by historical and present evidence. In the past it was expressed, for example, by the one-child policy in China and various ‘family planning’ programs, especially in Southeast Asian, Latin American and Sub-Saharan African countries. Nowadays, population control policies are designed and implemented with greater sophistication, especially at the level of discourse and purpose. From the existential environmental risk, the mother agenda of globalist progressivism, stem the following sub-agendas: (i) Abortion; (ii) Gender Ideology (GI) and LGBTPZ+ rights; (iii) Feminism, and; (iv) Euthanasia. All, without exception, share the same purpose, and they all illustrate progressivism’s obsession with sex, sexuality and reproduction. Today, sex is not promoted for procreative purposes but exclusively for recreational ones, very much in line with some predominant philosophical perspectives such as utilitarian hedonism. By removing the procreative variable from the sexual equation, the result is population stagnation and subsequent decline.

Abortion is an essential part of this strategy. Less babies means population stagnation and decline in the name of 'women’s reproductive rights’, 'women’s health’ and 'voluntary interruption of pregnancy’. Gender Ideology and the LGBTPZ+ agenda go hand in hand as both feed back into each other. Unlike abortion, whose demographic impact is short term, the demographic impact of GI is long term, represented by the time it takes a human being to initiate his or her sexual life. The thesis that sex is not biological, but that masculinity and femininity are 'culturally constructed’ is an ideological thesis grounded on Cartesian dualism that denies the self-evident truth of natural sexual dualism. Gender indoctrination does poison the minds and destroys the sexual identities of children and teens to the point of reproductive nullification. In the name of 'diversity’, all non-heterosexual behaviours not conductive to procreation are promoted while heterosexuality is vilified.

A third point on the rainbow agenda is the active promotion of feminism aimed at ending 'systemic inequalities’. Therefore, female ’empowerment’ is necessary to end the 'privileges’ of the ruling ‘hetero-patriarchal system’. Nevertheless, beyond its declared aims and purposes, what feminism really seeks is the criminalization of men’s natural sexual behaviour, with the silent but effective support of ideologically polluted judicial and ‘educational’ systems. If men’s freedoms are threatened by naturally approaching women, procreation will be severely diminished. Lastly, euthanasia, like abortion, also objectifies human beings by opening a path for self-destruction. The same logic flawless logic applied: less people, less population. What few warn about the 'humanitarian’ policies of progressivism is the increasing intrusion of the state into our private lives and decisions. The erosion of parental authority and the deliberate destruction of the nuclear family, a key institution for the defence of our freedoms, contribute to this threat. Moreover, in a world where morality is governed less and less by criteria of goodness and badness, and more and more by utility and uselessness, no fundamental human rights can be guaranteed.

The last guiding principle is 'inclusion’ but only for those who actively and publicly endorse and promote the rainbow agendas. For the silent majority against them there is only mockery, stigmatization, and verbal and physical abuse. Inclusion is nothing more than conformity to lies, obedience to standardization and the gradual subjugation of our freedoms. All in all, this level of ideological inbreeding and standardization empirically refutes all progressivism’s lies. It also shows that the their promise of an earthly paradise will only be achieved if we resign our humanity.